Test Marking: Learning Style & Ability
The PDI should take into account all that they understand about the pupil. They should recognise that different pupils will have different preferred approaches to learning, although these may only emerge fully over a number of lessons. Some pupils may be very willing to learn actively and others may want opportunities to reflect before they make the next step in their learning. The PDI should at least be able to give evidence of their sensitivity to these issues. In a one-off session this will probably be best demonstrated by offering a range of options. The PDI should be able to adjust their approach if evidence emerges of a different preferred style.
It is impossible to force learning on a pupil. Progress is always determined by what the pupil is comfortable with. The skill is recognising when the pupil stops learning. The pace of a session should be set by the pupil. On the other hand a pupil should not be talked out of experimenting, if this is within safe bounds.
When coaching, the PDI should ensure that the tools used are suitable. If a question and answer technique is used this should match the pupil’s level of ability and encourage them to use a higher level of thinking to give a response. Asking closed questions of a pupil who is demonstrating a high level of ability, unless this is to check knowledge, is of little use.
Asking open questions to a pupil of limited ability who is finding it difficult to achieve the task they have set for themselves may be very confusing. These are not hard and fast rules. The effectiveness of any question has to be assessed given the circumstances at the time.
Indications that all the elements of competence are in place could include:
actively working to understand how they can best support the pupil’s learning process (they might not achieve a full understanding in the session – it is the attempt that demonstrates competence)
modifying teaching style when or if they realise there is a need to do so
providing accurate and technically correct demonstration, instruction or information - giving technically incorrect instruction or information is an automatic fail if that input might lead to a safety critical situation
using practical examples and other similar tools to provide different ways of looking at a particular subject
linking learning in theory to learning in practice
encouraging and helping the pupil to take ownership of the learning process
responding to faults in a timely manner
providing enough uninterrupted time to practice new skills
providing the pupil with clear guidance about how they might practice outside the session
Indications of lack of competence include:
adopting a teaching style clearly at odds with the pupil’s learning style
failing to check with the pupil whether the approach they are taking is acceptable
failing to explore other ways of addressing a particular learning point
concentrating on delivering teaching tools rather than looking for learning outcomes
ignoring safety issues
Next: Encouraging the learner to take responsibility ...